Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://conacyt.repositorioinstitucional.mx/jspui/handle/1000/8027
Transient loss and recovery of oral chemesthesis, taste and smell with COVID-19: a small case-control series | |
Elisabeth Weir Cara E. Rice Richard C Gerkin Steven Munger John Hayes | |
Acceso Abierto | |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas | |
https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.27.23287763 | |
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.03.27.23287763v1 | |
Anosmia is common with respiratory virus infections, but loss of taste or chemesthesis is rare. Reports of true taste loss with COVID-19 were viewed skeptically until confirmed by multiple studies. Nasal menthol thresholds are elevated in some with prior COVID-19 infections, but data on oral chemesthesis are lacking. Many patients recover quickly, but precise timing and synchrony of recovery are unclear. Here, we collected broad sensory measures over 28 days, recruiting adults (18-45 years) who were COVID-19 positive or recently exposed (close contacts per U.S. CDC criteria at the time of the study) in the first half of 2021. Participants received nose clips, red commercial jellybeans (Sour Cherry and Cinnamon), and scratch-n-sniff cards (ScentCheckPro). Among COVID-19 cases who entered the study on or before Day 10 of infection, Gaussian Process Regression showed odor identification and odor intensity (two distinct measures of function) each declined relative to controls (close contacts who never developed COVID-19), but effects were larger for intensity than identification. To assess changes during early onset, we identified four COVID-19 cases who enrolled on or prior to Day 1 of their illness – this allowed for visualization of baseline ratings, loss, and recovery of function over time. Four controls were matched for age, gender, and race. Variables included sourness and sweetness (Sour Cherry jellybeans), oral burn (Cinnamon jellybeans), mean orthonasal intensity of four odors (ScentCheckPro), and perceived nasal blockage. Data were plotted over 28 days, creating panel plots for the eight cases and controls. Controls exhibited stable ratings over time. By contrast, COVID-19 cases showed sharp deviations over time. No single pattern of taste loss or recovery was apparent, implying different taste qualities might recover at different rates. Oral burn was transiently reduced for some before recovering quickly, suggesting acute loss may be missed in data collected after acute illness ends. Changes in odor intensity or odor identification were not explained by nasal blockage. Collectively, intensive daily testing shows orthonasal smell, oral chemesthesis and taste were each altered by acute COVID-19 infection, and this disruption was dyssynchronous for different modalities, with variable loss and recovery rates across modalities and individuals. | |
bioRxiv | |
29-03-2023 | |
Preimpreso | |
Inglés | |
Público en general | |
VIRUS RESPIRATORIOS | |
Appears in Collections: | Materiales de Consulta y Comunicados Técnicos |
Upload archives
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
Transient loss and recovery of oral chemesthesis.pdf | 1.81 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |