Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://conacyt.repositorioinstitucional.mx/jspui/handle/1000/451
Context matters: Contrasting behavioral and residential risk factors for Lyme disease between two high-incidence regions in the Northeastern and Midwestern U.S.
Scott Larson
Dave Gustafson
Lyric C. Bartholomay
Jean I. Tsao
Maria del Pilar Fernandez
Maria A. Diuk-Wasser
Gebbiena M. Bron
Adam Maus
Susan M. Paskewitz
Novel Coronavirus
Acceso Abierto
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas
10.1101/2020.01.31.20019810
The dynamics of zoonotic vector-borne diseases are determined by a complex set of parameters including human behavior that may vary with socio-ecological contexts. Lyme disease is the most common vector-borne disease in the United States and the Northeast and upper Midwest are the regions most affected - two areas with differing levels of urbanization and sociocultural settings. The probability of being diagnosed with Lyme disease is related to the risk of encounters with an infected blacklegged tick, which reflects both the environmental tick hazard and human behaviors. Herein, we compare behavioral and peridomestic risk factors associated with human-tick encounters between high-incidence states in the Northeast (New York and New Jersey) and Midwest (Wisconsin) of the United States. We used a smartphone application, The Tick App, as a novel survey tool, during spring and summer of 2018. Adaptive human behavior was identified in the relationship between outdoor activities and the use of preventive methods. More frequent recreational outdoor activities and gardening (a peridomestic activity) were associated with an increased likelihood of using personal protective measures. Weekly participation in non-seasonal recreational and peridomestic outdoor activities in spring and summer was associated with an increased likelihood of finding a tick in the fall or winter. Most outdoor activities were more frequently reported by participants from the Midwest than the Northeast. Participants in the Northeast reported less use of personal protective measures, but they reported more interventions to reduce the presence of peridomestic deer and ticks (i.e. pesticide applications on their property) than participants in the Midwest. Participants from the Midwest were more likely to kill rodents on their property. Context mattered, and our study illustrates the need for the assessment of personal behavior and tick exposure in these two Lyme disease-endemic regions to aid in targeted public health messaging to reduce tick-borne diseases. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. ### Funding Statement This work was Supported by Center for Disease Control and Prevention [Cooperative Agreements #U01 CK000505 and #U01 CK000509-01]. ### Author Declarations All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript. Yes All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable. Yes Summarized data is available upon request.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
2020
Preimpreso
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.31.20019810v1
Inglés
VIRUS RESPIRATORIOS
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos científicos

Cargar archivos:


Fichero Tamaño Formato  
Context matters.pdf668.42 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir